Date Published:
09/2005

Publication Type:
Journal Article

Authors:

L. Li
K. Gunasekaran
J.G.K. Gan
C. Zhanhua
P. Shapshak
M.K. Sakharkar
P. Kangueane

Secondary:
Bioinformation

Volume:
1

Pagination:
42-9

Issue:
2

URL:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

Keywords:
External

Abstract:
<p>The formation of homodimer complexes for interface stability, catalysis and regulation is intriguing. The mechanisms of homodimer complexations are even more interesting. Some homodimers form without intermediates (two-state (2S)) and others through the formation of stable intermediates (three-state (3S)). Here, we analyze 41 homodimer (25 2S and 16 3S) structures determined by X-ray crystallography to estimate structural differences between them. The analysis suggests that a combination of structural properties such as monomer length, subunit interface area, ratio of interface to interior hydrophobicity can predominately distinguish 2S and 3S homodimers. These findings are useful in the prediction of homodimer folding and binding mechanisms using structural data.</p>